How to explain that a simulation is not a guarantee

· 7 min read

Editorial illustration about explaining that a simulation is not a guarantee

Quick facts

Goal
Make clear, before and after showing the image, that it is an illustration and not a promise
When to say it
Before showing, during the presentation and in the written document
Material
Spoken phrase, disclaimer on the image and signed consent form
Common mistake
Stating the disclaimer once, quickly, and then talking as if it were a promise

A patient who sees their own retouched image tends to remember it more strongly than any sentence you say. That is why the explanation that a simulation is not a guarantee must be given at the right moment, in simple words, and repeated at the end. A disclaimer mumbled in passing protects neither the patient nor you.

This page organizes the conversation: what to say before, during and after the image, which phrases work, where the disclaimer should appear in writing and how to handle the hardest question: "so it will look like this?". The broader ethical side is in ethics of result simulation.

Why is a simulation not a guarantee?

Explaining well starts with knowing the reason, because patients notice when a phrase is memorized. The reasons are concrete:

  • The image is static. The face lives in motion, and the simulation shows no expression, speech or smile.
  • Tissue response varies. Water absorption, swelling, skin quality and metabolism change from person to person.
  • The result settles over time. What you see on the day of the injection is not what you see weeks later.
  • There are technical and safety limits. Not everything an image shows is prudent to carry out.
  • The AI approximates, it does not measure. Harmy's projection is an image generation, not a calculation of the result.

In clinical language, the simulation is an illustrative simulation: it communicates a direction. The technical limits are in limits of 2D simulation and in simulation does not show movement.

In what order should you run the conversation?

Order changes the effect. When the disclaimer comes after the image, it arrives late: emotion has already taken the place. It is better to use three moments.

The third step, asking the patient to repeat it back, is the most underrated. It reveals misunderstandings on the spot and takes thirty seconds.

Which phrases help and which get in the way?

Small changes of wording change a lot about how the patient reads it.

Avoid Prefer
"It will look like this." "This is a possible direction."
"This is your result." "This is an illustration of the plan."
"It will look exactly like this." "It usually ends up close to this, but it varies."
"You can trust the image." "Use the image as a support, not as a contract."
"You will definitely like it." "If you don't like it, we'll talk and adjust."

The phrases on the left sound like a guarantee and create an expectation that is hard to meet. Those on the right are honest and still confident. For a script for each situation, the page what never to say when showing the simulation is a good companion.

What do you do when the patient asks "will it look the same?"

It is the most common question and the one that needs the most care. Answering "yes" to please is the trap. Answering "I don't know" sounds insecure. The balanced answer has three parts: confirm the intention, acknowledge the variation and open the door to adjustment.

  1. Confirm the intention. "The idea is to reach proportions similar to the image."
  2. Acknowledge the variation. "The body responds in its own way and it may look a little different."
  3. Open the door to adjustment. "If needed, we'll reassess at the follow-up and adjust calmly."

The same reasoning appears in patient wants a result identical to the simulation and in why the real result differs from the simulation.

Where should the disclaimer appear in writing?

The spoken explanation needs written reinforcement. The natural places are four:

  • On the image itself. The "illustrative simulation" disclaimer visible on any image that leaves the office.
  • In the informed consent form. A clause stating that the simulation is illustrative and does not guarantee results.
  • In the quote. A short note that the images are illustrations.
  • In the patient record. The record of the explanation and of the patient's reaction.

The suggested text is in disclaimer text for illustrative simulation and the consent clause in simulation and informed consent. The final document should be reviewed by legal counsel and in line with your professional council's rules.

How do you handle the expectations of someone who has seen filters?

Today's patient compares the simulation with social media filters, which smooth skin and change features without limit. This creates an unrealistic yardstick. It is worth explaining that Harmy's simulation is intentionally subtle and changes only what was marked, precisely so as not to promise the impossible. The difference between a filter and planning is covered in filter face: how to handle unrealistic references.

The same logic applies to someone who arrives with another person's photo: the simulation starts from the patient's face, not from the reference face.

How do you measure whether the explanation worked?

Saying it is not enough. Check that the patient understood. Some signs the explanation worked:

  • they talk about "direction" or "idea", not "result";
  • they ask about the follow-up and adjustment;
  • they accept that the image does not show movement;
  • they decide without rushing and without phrases like "so it will look like this, right?".

And signs it did not work: they repeat "I want it exactly the same", ask to see it once more with more volume, compare with another person's photo or get irritated when they hear the caveat. In those cases, stop and resume the conversation before going on.

Quiz: myth or fact?

Summary

  • Explain before, during and after showing the image.
  • Swap promise phrases for direction phrases.
  • Answer "will it look the same?" with intention, variation and adjustment.
  • Reinforce in writing: disclaimer on the image, clause in the consent form, entry in the patient record.
  • Ask the patient to repeat what they understood.
  • An expectation of absolute sameness is a warning sign for the plan.

Frequently asked questions

How do you explain to the patient that a simulation is not a guarantee?

Say before showing that the image is an illustration, describe what it does not represent and repeat the limit at the end of the conversation. Record in writing that the patient understood.

Is the disclaimer on the image enough?

No. The visual disclaimer is a reinforcement, but the spoken explanation and the entry in the patient record or consent form are what show that the patient was truly informed.

What should you say if the patient asks whether it will look the same?

Answer honestly that the image is a direction, that tissue response varies and that the goal is to get close to the plan, without promising it will be identical.

Do I need to ask for a signature about the simulation?

It is good practice to include in the informed consent form a clause stating that the simulation is illustrative. The final text should be reviewed by legal counsel and follow your professional council's rules.

Harmy images are illustrative simulations generated by AI from the patient's photo to support the conversation between practitioner and patient. They are not a promise of results. Indication, technique, product and volume are solely the decision of the licensed practitioner. This content is for information only and does not replace a clinical assessment.

Terms mentioned

Related reading